Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 15:21
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why are French people known for having affairs?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What makes cars from companies like Dacia or BYD appealing compared to Tesla, especially in Europe?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What are some great short jokes?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
New Apple study challenges whether AI models truly “reason” through problems - Ars Technica
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
'Brady Bunch' Star Mourns Terrible Loss: 'My Heart is Broken' - Yahoo
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why do men like to have sex with a woman's ass?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.